is it is a moment in "history" as recorded by the machine, in which the image has been manipulated so that it might become "history" (in the case of the kapra photo that was directed to seem real, a simulacra)whereas in the marker still frame it is the possibility of the transcendence of the machine.
7 Comments:
different angle, same gun?
both they were alive after they were "shot".
photographs constitute a magical circle which surrounds us in the form of the photographic universe. It is this circle which we must break through.
no difference
both are fiction
there is not about real and fiction, there is not about right or wrong, there is not about true or fake, it is about abstract or specified.
what does right or wrong have to do with it?
is this a question on the ethics of aesthetics?
it is a moment in history as it is recorded by the machine.
is it is a moment in "history" as recorded by the machine, in which the image has been manipulated so that it might become "history" (in the case of the kapra photo that was directed to seem real, a simulacra)whereas in the marker still frame it is the possibility of the transcendence of the machine.
Post a Comment
<< Home